The Right to Own a Gun Essay -- Argumentative Persuasive Essays

The Right to Own a submarine Are you willing to sit back and become a victim of knock-down-and-drag-out criminal offense or allow the government to tamper with your civil liberties? In recent years, anti-gun politicians have attempted to control guns in the name of crime prevention this is an trespass on the moment Amendment flops of US citizens . The Second Amendment states, A well regulated Militia being necessary to the Security of a free state, the safe of the state to keep and ease up arms, shall not be infringed. Not only did our Founding Fathers focus their debate on the right of people to keep and bear arms, they given energy to encouraging future generations to defend theses freedoms. In defense of gun ownership, Alexander Hamilton give tongue to, If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to run an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all infe rior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights and those of their fellow citizens. During our countrys development hundreds of law-abiding citizens were able to nonplus up arms against lawless mobs to defend themselves, their family, their homes, and their businesses. They did the job law enforcement simply could not do. Lives were saved. Robberies were prevented. Homes and businesses were defended and left intact, all thanks to the Second Amendment to our constitutional, the right to keep and bear arms.Americans have made it clear they reject most government intrusions on their basic civil rights, including the right of gun ownership. According to an April 18, 1994 study by Penn and Schoen Associates, Inc. as many as 85 percent of American adults said they are unwilling to forfeit basic civil liberties even if it could enhance their personal safety. 75 percent agreed that police and the justice systems couldnt protect them people said they h ave to take more responsibility for safeguarding themselves. 62 percent said the need for personal guns ownership is increasing, and a majority is unwilling to accept laws that restrict gun ownership greatly. Guns, Crime, and Freedom states that, no gun law which restricts the right of law-abiding citizens to own guns has been proven to reduce crime or homicides, not even the Brady Law and the Clinton Crime Bill. These two laws st... ...f federal law enforcement agencies did their jobs with respect to guns and convicted hot felons using only GCA68, as reformed, gun control would not be an issue and we would be a long way toward solving the violent crime problem. We would be getting criminals off the streets and into jail. Americans want violent criminals off the streets and out of their neighborhoods. The bottom line is Americans are upset about crime and thoroughly reject government solutions that infringe on their rights and liberties.Ultimately, it is a persons choice to use f irearms to commit violent crimes. So criminals should be controlled, not the guns which they voice with millions of law-abiding citizens. Gun control supporters claim that gun control lowers crime rate. We as people need to take a stand and fight for our Second Amendment and the right to bear arms. Gun control advocates need to realize that passing laws that honest gun owners will not obey is a self-defeating strategy. Gun owners are not about to surrender their liberties or their right to bear arms. The Federal Govement of the United States should not be able to take away the right of law-abiding citizens to own a gun.