The Moon Landing Conspiracy Theory

The stargaze Landing Conspiracy TheoryBill Kaysing predicted in 1959 the jeopardys of getting a man to the woolgather and corroborate was genuinely funky due to the radiation and micro meters that may harm any kind being. Were two years later president J. F. Kennedy made his renowned actors line saying that he will assign the regular army with lots of recourses of landing place a man on the laze before the decade was e genuinelyplace .which was never d ace before and although undoable at the time the excogitate was so fascinating that e rattling adept was talking about it out and every unitary was waiting for the get out that rocket will take off from earth to the unknown planet, the stagnate. eighter from Decatur years later Apollo 11 similarlyk off to the moon carrying three throng and came back safely .so.neil Armstrong and his crew won the race against Russia .a lot of very persuasive divergentiate has been discovered and the people curb doubted that America did dismount a man to the moon, and that was when the Apollo hoax was born. There atomic number 18 three sources of evidence for this hoax Photographic, video, and scientific. Wide Spread ConspiracyIn this hoax hand over that contractors, NASA tells every adept about the moon landing conclave and pays them for their services that their not giving. Nasa makes an annunciation to the public telling them that their making rocket parts. Then at the elemental day of work they tell everybody in the factory that they be not re altogethery making rocket parts and that if they cooperate they will be set for life. Employees that do not comply are threatened from NASA officials. The utilizefulness to this is type of conspiracy that no real equipment has to be made, except for a rocket to go up and a Lander to get down down.If we sent six roughly spacecrafts to the moon in ten years, then why in thirty years with so many technological advances why didnt they go back to the moon not e ven once? NASA argues that in that location was a bullion cut .for the first ten years this corporation be explained afterward the Apollo missionary stations, because of the buildup of nuclear weapons would have cost money that could have been taken absent from NASA. But what happened during the other twenty years? Some groups say that the risks were too high to validate another moon landing, but the risk was on that point the first time and it will always be there. A chance is that the technology obtainable is still not enough for mankind to go to the moon, because we didnt go to the moon in the first place. Photographic Evidence Moon landing photographs are the main argument for the Apollo conspiracy believers, as there are hundreds of moon photographs that have mistakes on them, for example different hint directions. Because of these mistakes the photos are believed fake by the conspiracy followers. Those people explain why create fake photos of something that really ha ppened? wizard of the most constant arguments is that the moon landing photos and videos are faked is simply that there are no stars in the sky which is im viable.Although scientists explain this phenomenon, arguing that the tv cameras used by the Apollo mission had manual(a) glint filters, which is similar to a persons eye pupil, The Sun reflects off of the moons step to the fore and the white suits of the astronauts. Making both remarkably bright, unlike the stars which are very far and so very dim .The cameras on the Apollo mission are put on a bright setting, so the moon and the astronauts are visible but the stars are not visible because of the flood of get out from both the moon and astronauts even though there is an explanation for no stars, there are many other photos that look like they have multiple light up sources shining on the surroundings, casting wickednesss in different directions even though the sun is the scarcely light source available on the moon , whic h the same scientists failed to explain .The conspiracy believers quarrel that the only possible way several light sources could be shining on the set, is if these photos and videos were taken in a cinema studio in Hollywood. One of the biggest anomalies that appear on the Moon snaps are the way in which shadows have the appearance _or_ semblance to be cast in totally different directions, even though the objects making the shadows are a mere few feet apart. An exampleof this is in one of the come acrosss where the shadow of the Lander is pointing east while the rocks which are a few meters away are pointing south-east. The conspirasitsts say that in order for this to happen they had to use more than then one light source a trick producers use tohighlight certain areas while shooting a movie . Another picture shows two astronauts with one of the astronauts shadows bent .scientists say that angled shadows come from one long artificial light work this explanation could work, as movie lights do cause this effect. Although this has to do with ones own opinion but the conspiracy theorists explanation could work. Another example is the picture of Earth taken from the Apollo 11 when it was 130,000 miles away. This was the very first view ever taken of Earth on the mission and in the picture the window frame appears on the left(p) of the shot which seems very strange as one would want to come as close as he can so one can get the best shot and also to eliminate any light reflections .but Buzz Aldrin, one of the astronauts on the mission and the one who took the shot , took it when he was standing far away from the window also the camera is not put to infinity to get the closest shot possible. what is more According to nasa ,crosshairs were built inside the cameras that would help the astronauts calculate distances on the moon .having said that those crosshairs should be present on all the footage Furthermore on all Apollo footage there should be cross hairs pr esent on the adopt Incidentally, Jan Lundberg, executive vice president and head of discovery research at Astra Zeneca has stated that the only way that one could calculate the distance in the shot using the crosshairs would be if one had two cameras set up to take a stereo picture. Moreover all of the crosshairs have disappeared from the make. This is impossible unless the blast has been tampered with. Other than that all the crosshairs should be not hidden backside any item and should be completely observable in all shots. The only explanation is that NASA has either erased out certain objects in the film or added the objects over the crosshairs.Scientific evidence As a point of fact the great variation in temperature that the films would have had to go by dint of during the Apollo mission ranges between-180F degrees in the shade to an incredible -200F degree. As seen in some shots the astronauts move between the shadows of the rocks then into full sunlight definitely the fi lm would have corroded under such circumstances. If the films used on that mission had such characteristics why isnt Kodak selling them today in the markets? Some of the igniter on the footage is very doubtful. One of the pictures shows the astronaut in complete shadow because the sun is behind him, although the whole astronaut is caught in vivid light The video cameras used on the mission were specially fitted with night lenses to prove the lack of light because the reflectivity of light is very low on the moon that light does not reflect onto the rocks on the ground. Having said that how can still camera take photos so bright and clear that one can see all the details on aldrins suit and on the lunar Lander. This is only possible if the artificial lighting is used or it has been added to the photos, although NASA confirmed that absolutely no artificial light was used .how is it possible to have no artificial light and yet the pictures are so bright that even aldrins boot protect or is lit up.Dr. David groves that works for quantech mountain range processing has studied these shots and using the focal length of the camera and he was able to get hold of the boot aldrin was wearing and using these tools he was able to find the exact point at which the artificial light was used.Next comes the picture that shows neil Armstrong at landing site in the reflector of his visor. The stange thing about this photo is that the crosshair that is supposed to be in the position appears at the bottom near aldrins right leg. How is that possible if the cameras where attached to the authority of the cameraman? A fact that is provable due to the reflection of the camera man in the visor.All this evidence suggests that man did not go to the moon and that all the films and pictures are fake because man would have to closure near the earths magnetic field for safety. But why would NASA fake and the US fake the moon landing?NASA MotivesThere are many theories concerning the mo tives of the USA government to the stage the moon landing .some of these are war prestige, pecuniary gain and they also used it as a distraction. It was a very important for the us government to win the race against the soviet sexual union and they also used this incident to distract the gentleman from the Vietnam war ,so missions were scratch and so the united states took the chance and ceased its partaking in the Vietnam war. According to Bill Kaysing undefeated landings on the moon was calculated to be 0.017% which ensures that the chance of getting a man to the moon is almost impossible .30 billion was collected and paid off to people as a motivation for their silence .at that time moon landing was impossible and still is impossible, but o fulfill president kennedys promise the only solution was to make the world believe they landed on the moon when they actually did not .another moderateness NASA was forced to fake the moon landing to protect its image in front of the wor ld and save itself from the embarrassment and their fear of national cautious.Did bit go to the Moon? It is a controversial issue, considering how absurd the question capability first seem. Despite the loads of evidence available that prove that the moon landing was faked ,there is still a doubt about the whole issue