Fanon and de Beauvoir: Opposing Discrimination Essay example -- Psycho

Fanon and de Beauvoir opposing DiscriminationAll modern (i.e. post-paleolithic) religions contain the Gnostic trace of suspect or even outright hostility to the proboscis and the created world. Contemporary lowbred tribes and even peasant-pagans have a concept of immortality and of going-outside-the- consistence (ec-stasy) without necessarily exhibiting any riotous body-hatred. The Gnostic Trace accumulates very gradu completelyy (like mercury poisoning) till at last it turns pathological. Gnostic dualism exemplifies the extreme position of this disgust by shifting every value from body to spirit. This idea characterizes what we call civilization.-Hakim Bey, instruction War, c-theory a022Struggles against injustice in the 20th century tend to compact a drearily similar form. First the advocate recognizes that not all people ar equal, next demands that slightly irrelevant differences are ignored, and in conclusion tries to make all people people again. This method has be come so popular it has been applied all the way down the ladder of inferiority, to adjudge politically-irrelevant unequal treatment on every possible basis. The effort is, in a sense, a drive to move from the created world outside the body to a cheery world of equality in the mind. This hostility to the body and ex unmatchedration of a universal subject, unfortunately, is also precisely the basic move of the discrimination whizz must condemn in step one of struggles for equality. The subject is a problem for many reasons, but the explicit announcement of the inferiority of some to others relies purely on an ability to say what a person is or should be, and what not. If some are treated as less(prenominal) than human, it may well be because of the category of human itself.... ...attempt to initiate some oppressed groups into the class of oppressors. What may well be needed instead of trading places in the system of constructed identities centered around one precedent subj ect is a rethinking of the subject itself, a problematization of the role of self that Fanon and de Beauvoir are so anxious to expand just enough to allow in their chosen group. The analogy to Moses is apt, the Gnostic impulse here can be seen in both thinkers as they rescue their people from the servitude in one land, take them through a long initiation process to the promised land, which is disappointing, and and then allow them free reign as stable subjects to wage warfare against their own enemies and dominate the Canaanites as they had been dominated. There is a perverse creep of the golden rule being obeyed discriminate against others as you were once discriminated against.