Grading Rubric for Non-Profit Case The following rubric pull up stakes be used for the evaluation of team intromissions (in class and nett indite compend) of your nonprofit studys. Note that the component aras of a essential plate presentation are listed on the left column, and levels of proceeding are listed across. This listing can help you better erect your case analysis and presentation. Evaluation criteria are listed for both the study presentation and the process aspects (e.g., teamwork, presentation style). |Component |Unacceptable (C) | welcome (B- to B) | costly (B+) |Excellent (A- to A) | |External analysis | trammel | 3-4 impertinent | 5-6 factors, | 7-10 factors, expound| |(description of external change drivers: |discussion of |factors identified and| draw with |with colligate examples, | |political, economic, demographic, |external factors |described with |examples, related to |prioritized relevant to | |technological, social, legal, etc.
) |(1-2, poorly |examples |organisational events|the firm | | |described, no | |and performance | | | |examples) | | | ! | |Internal analysis | limited | 2-3 factors | 4-5 described, | 6+ described, | |(description of functional departments & |discussion of |described, with |with examples |prioritized, show general| |relationships: finance, marketing, R&D, |internal factors (1|examples |reflecting key |connections | |manufacturing, HR, etc.) |described, no | |processes |...If you want to specify a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment